Beschuldigingen tegen Payvision: ondersteuning fraude en grootschalige witwaspraktijken

02 november 2020
Kennisbank

Elfriede Sixt

Onze Duitstalige collega’s hadden, zoals bekend, in 2016 al hun bedenkingen tegen de gang van zaken bij Wirecard in Duitsland. Elfriede Sixt van EFRI (European Funds Recovery Initiative) uit Wenen stelt nu dat Nederland met  Payvision haar eigen Wirecard in huis heeft. Voor ING is dit geen goed nieuws. Toen ING in de lente van 2018 een belangrijk deel van de aandelen Payvison kocht liep namelijk het fraudeonderzoek van het Openbaar Ministerie tegen de ING Bank nog. In dezelfde lente van 2018 was er blijkbaar verschil van inzicht binnen het Openbaar Ministerie over die zaak. Ondertussen is er nog steeds geen uitspraak gedaan door het Haagse Gerechtshof in de zaak met verzoeken om strafvervolging in te stellen tegen de voormalige CEO van ING, de heer Ralph Hamers. In februari 2020 is bekendgemaakt dat Hamers bij UBS aan de slag kon gaan. We publiceren hierbij het artikel van Elfriede Sixt in het Engels. Het mag duidelijk zijn dat dit soort grootschalige fraude de rol van poortwachters extra belangrijk maakt. De vraag is dan ook zijn er Wwft meldingen gedaan en door wie?    

The operating companies (merchants) of the fraud online trading scams have been shell companies, mostly British, with nominee directors and nominee shareholders. Although the majority of contracts between Payvision and the companies operating the scams were signed by these straw men, according to the statements made in interrogations of these straw men, there were neither any communication or meetings at all between them and Payvision. The communication as well as the agreements were made directly with the Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBO) behind the scams. Uwe Lenhoff and the Israeli Gal Barak discussed all the scam details themselves whereas on the Payvision side, communication at the board level was either done by Rudolf Booker himself or by Gijs op de Weegh.

Personal relationships

Booker and Lenhoff had a close private relationship (joint skiing holiday) according to the tapped telephone logs between Booker and Lenhoff. Although the acquiring contracts between Payvision and the fraudulent brands were terminated in December 2018, phone calls between Booker and Lenhoff about the business took place until the end of January 2019 – the latest one two days before Lenghoff was arrested.

Total stolen money processed by Payvision

Accordingly, the companies attributed to Uwe Lenhoff and platforms generated a total turnover (stolen money) of EUR 55,646,534.79 with Payvision. The companies and platforms attributed to Gal Barak show a total turnover of EUR 75,610,779.87 with Payvison. Chargebacks are a repayment process which is initiated by the credit card holder. Booker stated that although the chargeback rate was high, Gal Barak achieved around 65% and Uwe Lenhoff around 40% of repayments successfully combated. Payvision’s own fees were charged for these chargebacks. Later a “single rate” was introduced, which included the commission and chargeback fees. So Booker was aware of all the chargebacks by the distressed victims – he just did not care.

The amounts stated only cover the schemes from Uwe Lenhoff and Gal Barak, not all the other scams which have been and probably are still processed by Payvision – a subsidiary of ING.

Warnings from European Supervisory Authorities

There had already been warnings published by various financial market supervisory authorities against the fraud schemes from Uwe Lenhoff and Gal Barak from 2016 onwards (see below), but Payvision ignored all of them. On the contrary, Booker urged Uwe Lenhoff to sign a referral agreement with Uwe Lenhoff providing him a fee for other scam referrals – however, Lenhoff was arrested before that happened.

Reward for the founders and board of Payvision

In September 2019, ING bought the remaining 25% share in Payvision, although ING must have already known about the kind of business Payvision was involved in, so they “rewarded” Booker and his partners with even more money. At the same time, hundreds and thousands of unsuspecting European consumers have suffered from having been ripped off and having lost their life-time savings to scammers with the support of Payvision.

Actions of EFRI

The EFRI (European Funds Recovery Initiative) is based in Vienna. EFRI is an investors protection initiative to fight for the right of victims of investments scams. In our opinion, Payvision is Netherland´s WIRECARD – a company helping scammers in big style fraud. We filed a money laundering complaint against Payvision already in summer 2019 (except for a receipt confirmation, no response has been received from the relevant authorities). After having much more information now found in the criminal file as well as detailed information on the total volume, we are about to send an updated version to the Dutch Central Bank – in charge for Payvision.

We requested the restitution of the payments to the victims from Gal Barak (claim letter here) and Uwe Lenhoff as enclosed from Payvision. No response received from them up until now.

We are preparing legal steps against Payvision

Please get in touch: For any lawyers and for press people interested in seeing the material in the criminal files of Gal Barak and Uwe Lenhoff, please contact us.

1) Despite the fact that Stichting Trusted Third Party Payvision and Stichting Trusted Third Party Acapture are not a subsidiary of Payvision Holding, they are consolidated. A special framework is formulated in an agreement between Stichting Third Party Payvision and Payvision B.V., whereby Stichting Third Party Payvision provides execution of payment services exclusively to Payvision B.V. and/or its merchants. The agreement stipulates that operational deposits are to be held and used to cover the operational financial exposure, which may arise if and when negative collections are imposed upon merchant accounts. The agreement also states that Payvision B.V. bears all costs in relation to the execution of services, profit and losses of Stichting Third Party Payvision such as all taxes, bank charges and also those financial and economic risks in relation to the accounts operated by Stichting Third Party Payvision. A similar agreement is in place between Stichting Trusted Third Party Acapture and Acapture B.V.

The author, Elfriede Sixt ist Wirtschaftsprüferin, Steuerberaterin. Sie absolvierte bereits im Jahre 1993 die Prüfung zum US CPA und war in der Folge jahrelang als Gesellschafterin und Geschäftsführerin von Ernst & Young Wien tätig. Frau Mag. Sixt beschäftigt sich seit einigen Jahren mit dem Thema Crowdfunding und publiziert zu Themen aus diesem Bereich (beispielsweise das Buch “Schwarmökonomie und Crowdfunding” im SpringerGabler Verlag). Im September 2016 wird ihr zweites Buch: Bitcoin und andere dezentrale Transaktionssysteme /Blockchains als Basis einer Kryptoökonomie veröffentlicht. Seit 2018 beschäftigt sich Frau Mag. Sixt mit Cybercrime, sie gründete den Verein EFRI – European Funds Recovery Initiative, der sich mit Cyber-Betrug an Konsumenten beschäftigt und adressiert dabei auch die Problematik der Geldwäscheproblematik bei europäischen Finanzdienstleistern.


Plaats uw reactie

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *